ammunition clip ban, assualt weapon ban, Chicago Violence Tax, Cook County Violence Tax, Gulf Restoration Act, H.R. 56, hurricane Sandy, Iran Threat Reduction, marial law, martial law in northeast, national emergency, Obama's Executive Orders, Oxfam America, people in shelters after Sandy, reduced voting after hurricane, reduced voting after Sandy, Rockefeller, S. 1140, sanctioned person in Iran sanctions, Senate Report 93-549, stakeholders, Syria Human Rights Act, U.N. Agenda 21, U.N. Small Arms Treaty, Violence Tax, White House Homeland Security Partnership
Executive Orders are symptom of our nation being under a ‘national emergency’ since the Civil War. All during the Civil War congress could not meet, as no quorum was possible without President Lincoln’s Executive Orders forcing such Congress to meet outside Constitutional parameters. Even then all Acts by the ‘rump’ Congress, without a quorum should be suspect as illegal. This including the 14th Amendment, which made all Americans federal citizens with reduced rights. Reduced rights, as the 14th Amendment did not include a Bill of Rights, only rights allowed by the federal government.
As long as the national emergency is not rescinded by the Executive Branch the phenomenon will continue. An example is Senate Report 93-549 (93rd Congress, 1st Session, 1973):
“A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years [now 66 years], freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency. The problem of how a constitutional democracy reacts to great crises, however, far antedates the Great Depression. As a philosophical issue, its origins reach back to the Greek city-states and the Roman Republic. And, in the United States, actions taken by the Government in times of great crises have – from, at least, the Civil War – in important ways, shaped the present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency.”
We no longer have a Republic, we live under the edict of a president.
“It is not because part of the government is elective, that makes it less a despotism, if persons so elected possess afterwards, unlimited powers. Election in this case, becomes separated from Representation, and the candidates are candidates for despotism.”
Time to look at a few recent Executive Orders by Barrack Obama. The most recent was issued on October 26th, 2012, titled “ ” Establishing the White House Homeland Security Partnership Council”. Under Section 3. Mission and Function of the Council and Steering Committee, stakeholders is used throughout to designate ‘you’ and your property.
Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, defines ‘stakeholders’ as ” A person with whom money is deposited pending the decision of a bet or wager. Also a third person chosen by two or more persons to keep in deposit property the right or possession of which is contested between them, and to be delivered to the one who shall establish his right to it”. One definition makes no sense, while the other refers to the fact that if you are a stakeholder, you don’t own the property. Who the two or more persons are in the definition, concerning the right to the property, could best be guessed at the 1)federal corporation based in Washington D.C.; 2) the United Nations through Agenda 21; 3) the Pope of the Catholic Church; as all new lands discovered by Columbus were granted to the church and 4) the British government, due to charters granted by the King in the original colonies.
It appears that this Executive Order is designed to encourage communities, cities and counties to adopt Homeland Security principles. As the document states, “raise awareness of local partnerships and best practices that can support homeland security priorities”. It would seem they are preparing for martial law, as has already happened in Long Beach, New York after hurricane Sandy.
Another recent Executive Order was issued on October 9th, 2012 titled Authorizing The Implementation Of Certain Sanctions Set Forth In The Iran Threat Reduction And Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 And Additional Sanctions With Respect to Iran. The New American did an article about this EO. According to the article, “the order says that if an individual is declared by the president, the secretary of state, or the secretary of the treasury to be a “sanctioned person,” he (or she) will be unable to obtain access to his accounts, will be unable to process any loans (or make them), or move them to any other financial institution inside or outside the United States.” To top it off, if the sanctioned person tries to sue for loss of money, the case will be denied. This can be done to an American in the name of Iran sanctions.
Several months ago OxFam America (Rockefeller funded) was pushing on a Bill called the Gulf Resolution Act. It was H.R. 56 in the House of Representatives and S. 1140 in the Senate. The Bill was tied up in committees and looked like it was headed no-where. Obama once said, if Congress won’t pass legislation, than I will. Enter Executive Order signed on September 10th, 2012 Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration. With the coaxing of Rockefeller, Obama signed an Executive Order because Congress was slow, or had no intention of passing the statute. Not being normal procedure in passing legislation, doesn’t stop an Executive Order from accomplishing the same.
Rockefeller was also pushing the U.N. Small Arms Treaty as previously reported, on this website. It wasn’t just Rockefeller pushing the United Nations agenda, it was Soros as well. Going back to late 90’s the Senate refused to pass U.N. Agenda 21, and so Bill Clinton stepped in with an Executive Order, and Americans have been under Agenda 21 rule ever since. Which ever candidate is elected in 2012 for the presidency, is going to use the same tactic for the U.N. Small Arms Treaty and once again it will be slow-roasting American’s Creator endowed right to keep and bear arms, mark my words. It will be slow at first, as Cook County (Chicago), Illinois has passed a Violence Tax on gun owners as reported by (Rothschild) Reuters. It is for the cost of healthcare caused by gun violence, as if all gun owners are violent and not protecting live and property. It too will start out slow, at 5 cents a round of ammunition and $25 on the purchase of a firearm. It is the first in the nation to tax arms and ammunition in this manner, but it is also the camels-nose-in-the-tent and we know where this is headed – up for revenue. After the election, watch for the assault weapons ban, which could include all semi-autos and will include ammunition feeding devices (clips).
Returning to hurricane Sandy, with most of the Obama voters in the large cities hit by this storm, it is amazing that Obama has not signed an Executive Order to delay the election until power can be restored. It would conflict with the Constitution which sets the day for the election as the first Tuesday in November, but since when does the Constitution matter to the government? This map shows the areas that still don’t have electricity, no gasoline being pumped, along with limited supply, and people with electric furnaces are in the cold. The sheer numbers of people living in shelters, far away from their polling places will also interfere with voter turnout.
There are areas of the northeast that are under martial law, as read in this story and the video above. Looting being the problem, as we saw after Katrina. Firearm confiscation in those areas is another possibility.
Early next week, the northeast may see another storm according to weather.com but hopefully not to the extend of Sandy.
Breaking Update: New York citizens may get an extra day of voting, or schedule a day 20 days further into the month for voting. This will happen if the voter turn out is less than 25%. An unconstitutional move, but Obama needs those progressives to vote. Back to the Supreme Court? a possibility.